Anne Martel

At A Glance

• Main focus on development of machine learning techniques for segmentation and classification.
• Active in breast cancer research with projects in breast cancer screening with MRI and digital pathology in the breast.
• Emphasis on translation with collaborative links to industry.
• Software developed using open source platforms and libraries including Python, R, ITK and openCV.

Short Bio

Dr. Martel received a BSc in Physics from King’s College, University of London, UK in 1987 and a PhD in Medical Physics from University of Sheffield, UK in 1992. She spent 11 years as a Medical Physicist in the UK before moving to Canada in 2003. Dr Martel is currently a Senior Scientist at Sunnybrook Research Institute and an Associate Professor in the department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto. She is the also co-founder of Pathcore and Chief Scientific Officer of Pathcore, a software company which specializes in building tools to analyze and manage digital slide images.

Dr Martel is an active member of the medical image analysis community acting as Associate Editor on IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging since 2010 and serving on program committees for SPIE, MICCAI and ISBI conferences. Dr Martel was a general and scientific co-chair for MICCAI 2011 held in Toronto and was responsible for organizing the 2nd MICCAI international workshop on Breast Image Analysis in Nagoya, Japan in 2013.

Her research is focused on medical image analysis, particularly on applications of Machine Learning for segmentation and classification. Research areas include digital histopathology, computer aided diagnosis and detection of breast cancer using MRI, and data driven analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MR images using ICA.

Research Synopsis

Computer Aided Detection and Diagnosis for MRI Breast Screening: MRI is now established as the most effective screening modality for high risk groups of women. There are two main challenges to overcome with the reporting of MRI screening mammography - the false positive rate is high leading to many unnecessary biopsies and the time taken to report each exam is high which makes the provision of MRI screening an expensive proposition to a health care provider. Computer Aided Detection and dignosis systems can play a role in ameliorating both of these problems. We have demonstrated that it is possible to acheive high accuracy using features based on the DCE data (Levman et al. 2008) and, more recently on textural and morphological features (Gallego-Ortiz & Martel 2015).  We are also developing a fully automated system which includes fast motion correction (Martel et al. 2007), automatic segmentation of the chest wall (Martel & Gallego 2013; Khalvati et al. 2014) as well as the detection of suspicious lesions using neural networks.

Digital Pathology: Histopathology is the "gold standard" against which other imaging techniques are validated and it also provides a wealth of prognostic and predictive information that can be used to guide therapy and  understand disease. Digital pathology allows image processing techniques to be applied to microscopy images. The Martel Lab has developed Machine Learning techniques for the analysis of wholemount breast H&E images (Peikari et al. 2015).  We have also  developed a pipeline for reconstructing 3D pathology image volumes from serial sections that does not require implanted fiducials, can work on breast whole mount images and that has the potential to be useful for sparsely sampled data (Shojaii et al. 2014).  A start-up company, Pathcore Inc., was spun out of the lab to further develop and improve on viewing and analysis software for whole slide imaging and to build a management platform for digital pathology data. The Martel lab, Pathcore and several US labs are now collaborating on an NIH NCI project to develop a pathology image informatics platform (PiiP)  which will facilitate the development, sharing, validation and clinical translation of software for the analysis of wholeslide images

Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Images: Functional in vivo information can be extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences of images and there are many applications in cancer imaging both in diagnosis and in the assessment of therapeutic  response. There are, however, many challenges in ensuring that analysis methods are reproducible and that the contributions to the changing signal intensity due to different tissue components can be separated. The Martel lab has developed various unmixing methods based on PCA, Factor analysis and, more recently ICA (Mehrabian et al. 2013). These methods have been applied to a wide range of imaging modalities including dual-photon microscopy (Mehrabian, Lindvere, et al. 2012) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (Lueck et al. 2008). Using these approaches we are able to to separate intravascular and extravascular components from DCE-MRI images (Mehrabian, Chandrana, et al. 2012) allowing for more accurate modelling of tumour pharmacokinetics (Mehrabian et al. 2015).

Image Registration for DCE-MRI: In order to peform analysis on DCE image sequences it is first necessary to correct for motion. Image registration is particularly challanging in contrast-enhanced studies as it is necessary to differentiate beteen patient motion and the signal intensity changes of interest. We developed and validated a method of correcting for deformable motion in DCE-MRI breast studies in less than 2 minutes/volume. This technique resulted in a significant improvement in image quality. The resulting software was licensed to Sentinelle Medical who specialize in the manufacture of dedicated MR breast coils and MR guided biopsy guidance software (they are now part of Hologic) (Martel et al. 2007). The work has therefore been translated effectively into the clinical domain as it is now incorporated into the workflow of radiologists using the Aegis software. We have also worked on motion correction in the abdomen - a more challenging problem due to the large respiratory motion and increase contrast enhancement due to the presence of large vessels and highly perfused organs.

Recent Publications

• ​Gallego-Ortiz, C. & Martel, A.L., 2015. Improving the Accuracy of Computer-aided Diagnosis for Breast MR Imaging by Differentiating between Mass and Nonmass Lesions. Radiology, epub, p.150241. Available at: http://pubs.rsna.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/doi/abs/10.1148/radiol.2015150241.
• Khalvati, F. et al., 2014. Automated Segmentation of Breast in 3D MR Images Using a Robust Atlas. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34(1), pp.116–125. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25137725.
• Levman, J. et al., 2008. Classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector machines. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 27(5), pp.688–696. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2008.916959.
• Lueck, G.J. et al., 2008. Hepatic perfusion imaging using factor analysis of contrast enhanced ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 27(10), pp.1449–57. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18815097.
• Martel, A.L. et al., 2007. Evaluating an optical-flow-based registration algorithm for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Phys Med Biol, 52(13), pp.3803–3816. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/010.
• Martel, A.L. & Gallego, C., 2013. Method for automatic three-dimensional segmentation of magnetic resonance images. Available at: http://www.google.com/patents/US8417005
• Mehrabian, H., Lindvere, L., et al., 2012. A constrained independent component analysis technique for artery-vein separation of two-photon laser scanning microscopy images of the cerebral microvasculature. Medical image analysis, 16(1), pp.239–51. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21937257
• Mehrabian, H., Chandrana, C., et al., 2012. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. European Radiology, 22(8), pp.1735–47. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22752523.
• Mehrabian, H. et al., 2015. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 33(10), pp.1236–1245. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X15002027.
• Mehrabian, H., Chopra, R. & Martel, A.L., 2013. Calculation of intravascular signal in dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI using adaptive complex independent component analysis. IEEE t Trans Med Imaging, 32(4), pp.699–710. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23247848.
• Peikari, M. et al., 2015. Triaging Diagnostically Relevant Regions from Pathology Whole Slides of Breast Cancer: A Texture Based Approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, PP(99), p.1. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26302511.
• Shojaii, R. et al., 2014. Reconstruction of 3-Dimensional Histology Volume and its Application to Study Mouse Mammary Glands. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (89). Available at: http://www.jove.com/video/51325/reconstruction-3-dimensional-histology-volume-its-application-to.

Visit the Google Scholar profile of Dr. Anne Martel.

Graduate Students

Jianan Chen
Geoffrey Klein
Gregory Kuling
Jonathan Mazurski
Matthew Mcneil